As we all know, Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson sat down with moderator in chief Patrick Bett David for this supposed expose to reveal who is right and who is wrong... because sadly it's no longer about WHO IS DEAD, that would be CHARLIE!
Candace had the opportunity to prove her theory's and couldn't articulate a single one definitively at all for the entire 4 + hours. Andrew made himself look stupid because he tried to assassinate her character and the splashback hit him too.
As I say, there are ABSOLUTELY NO WINNERS here, only losers and at by the time this finished I added another two "losers" to the victim count.
Join with me as I try to dissect the facts of the case that Andrew submits he aligns with (as do I but for different reasons than he does to a degree.) And Candace fail at even attempting to avail to us a single shred of evidentiary proof that she knows WOULD BE REQUIRED if you had any thought about bringing the theory to a courtroom, a judge and a jury.
It's gonna be a long one guys, I hope you can stick with me, and strap in with snacks and coffee/booze (depending on what time you watch)
Just wanted to add that Andrew is a smoker too so that incessant foot shaking he displayed was also his way of relieving cravings. I forgot to mention that in the live broadcast. end note!

If you enjoy this channel, please help fund it; click subscribe during any livestream or donate by clicking my PayPal link here 👇🙏 https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/DownUnderT?locale.x=en_AU&fbclid=IwAR2bHCLpgT6DAL_K1A2kjvbHWyG0sCmwb-nQMIdoyAt9HDEYRndyHD0y5Ao DISCLAIMER This video is for entertainment purposes ONLY & designed to help your thinking, not direct it. These videos shall NOT be construed as tax, legal or financial advice and may be outdated or inaccurate; all decisions made as a result of viewing are yours alone. OUR RIGHT TO FAIR USE: I can use this content because of the right to "Fair Use" "Fair use for the purpose of criticism, commentary, satire, news reporting, teaching, education, and research."